Current Challenges in Scientific Research Collaboration: Processes, Publishing, and Barriers

Authors: Prof. Dr. oec Christian Abegglen, David Wang

Date: 20.12.2024

Current Challenges in Scientific Research Collaboration: Processes, Publishing, and Barriers

Scientific collaboration is at the heart of innovation, enabling breakthroughs that address pressing global issues. Yet, the processes that govern research partnerships and publishing remain fraught with inefficiencies and barriers. These challenges, from funding inequities to outdated publishing models, threaten to undermine the pace and inclusivity of global scientific progress.

Current Processes in Scientific Research Collaboration

In the modern research landscape, collaboration typically unfolds across these stages:

1. Proposal Development:

   • Researchers form partnerships based on shared goals, often across disciplines and geographies.

   • Funding proposals are developed collaboratively, aligning with the priorities of grant-making agencies.

2. Execution:

   • Projects leverage shared resources, including datasets, expertise, and infrastructure.

   • Communication relies on virtual platforms, yet challenges like time zone differences and resource disparities persist.

3. Data Analysis and Sharing:

   • Teams analyze data collaboratively, but the lack of standardization in formats and protocols complicates integration.

   • Data sharing is hindered by institutional silos and paywalls.

4. Publishing Results:

   • Findings are submitted to academic journals, a process that is often lengthy, expensive, and biased toward well-funded institutions.

How the Publishing Process Works Today

The publishing process for scientific research is a critical but often criticized stage. The current system follows these general steps:

1. Manuscript Submission:

   • Researchers submit their work to journals, often selecting based on journal impact factors (JIFs).

   • High-profile journals, such as Nature and Science, dominate the publishing landscape.

2. Peer Review:

   • Manuscripts undergo peer review, where other researchers evaluate their validity, methodology, and significance.

   • This process, while essential, is time-consuming and subject to biases, including favoritism and gatekeeping.

3. Publication:

   • Accepted papers are published, often behind paywalls that limit access to those without institutional subscriptions.

   • Open-access journals are gaining traction but frequently charge high publication fees, creating inequities.

4. Impact Metrics:

   • Research impact is measured through citations, downloads, and JIFs. These metrics often drive funding and career advancement but may not fully reflect the societal value of the research.

Addressing Process and Publishing Challenges

To improve collaboration and publishing, the scientific community must adopt systemic reforms:

1. Streamline Collaboration Processes:

   • Develop interoperable digital tools to facilitate seamless data sharing and communication.

   • Encourage equitable resource allocation to underfunded regions.

2. Reform Publishing Practices:

   • Expand open-access models that are affordable and inclusive.

   • Accelerate peer review processes using AI and digital platforms.

3. Adopt Universal Standards:

   • Implement FAIR data principles to ensure research findings are findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.

   • Create global frameworks for ethical and transparent data sharing.

4. Realign Incentives:

   • Redesign recognition systems to reward collaborative and interdisciplinary research.

   • Promote alternative metrics that capture societal impact alongside citations.

Conclusion: Building a Collaborative and Inclusive Future

The current processes governing scientific collaboration and publishing, while foundational, require urgent modernization to meet the demands of a globalized and rapidly evolving research landscape. By addressing systemic inefficiencies, fostering inclusivity, and reforming publishing practices, the scientific community can unlock its full potential, accelerating discovery and ensuring equitable access to the benefits of research.

Co-author of this article Prof. Dr. oec Christian Abegglen Advisor Science

Christian is a management expert and academic with a doctorate from the University of St. Gallen. He co-founded the St. Gallen Business School, transforming it into a premier institution for executive education in German-speaking Europe. Currently, he serves as Senior Executive Advisor at ISCM, University of St. Gallen, and holds leadership roles in integrated management organizations. He lectures at leading universities and coaches senior executives on strategy, leadership, and integrated management, bridging research and practical application.

Co-author of this article David Wang Founder of OpenDeSci

David is a management consultant and entrepreneur in digital transformation, M&A, and value creation strategies. Having worked with top firms like Deloitte Strategy, Roland Berger, and AT Kearney, he excels in problem-solving, execution, and entrepreneurial initiatives. An early blockchain and Web 3.0 investor, David has a strong network across industries such as automotive, blockchain, chemicals, financial service, life sciences, hospital and private equity. He has advised leading science companies, including Charite, Eurofins and ZEISS.

Legal Disclaimer: This content is the intellectual property of the OpenDeSci Foundation. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or use of this material, in whole or in part, without express written permission from the OpenDeSci Foundation, is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved. This material is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or other professional advice. The OpenDeSci Foundation does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategies, products, or services mentioned in this content. Any investment decisions or actions taken based on this material are solely at your own risk. The OpenDeSci Foundation assumes no liability for any losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any financial or investment decisions.